Will voice recognition software help or hinder medical transcription into the future? Those on the fringe of the profession often claim that transcriptionists will soon be redundant because of this medical transcription technology. Trouble is, they have been claiming it since voice recognition software first came out.
The truth is, most voice recognition programs tend to be cumbersome and, for most users, a distraction from what they are trying to dictate. If you are a doctor or medical professional, there are several other drawbacks. First, you have to spend many hours teaching the software to transcribe your voice. Given some of the medical terms in use today, that can be quite some job.
There are other drawbacks. Imagine dictating a diagnosis. This requires careful thought with little distractions. For software to understand what is being dictated, you have to add commands as you dictate – even for full stops and commas. Could you provide an accurate diagnosis while also remembering to tell the software when to add a full stop or comma (or capitals etc)? This is the one big drawback to any software program and it is one that is almost impossible to fix.
On the other hand, a medical transcriptionist knows where to put commas and full stops based on the voice, the inflection and the pauses on the recording. They also use a little common sense as well and it is this human involvement that will always ensure that medical transcriptionists are in work.
Will voice recognition software replace medical transcriptionists? Perhaps one day, but at present the technology is not quite good enough. Where medical transcription technology is moving forward is in the field of quality recordings and the digital transfer of voice files. Tape recordings are out and small digital recorders are in along with computers that can transmit the recording quickly. The future is still bright for medical transcriptionists.
